How Does Facebook Make Money?

Post image for How Does Facebook Make Money?

by A Blinkin on December 27, 2011

If you’ve logged into your Facebook recently you may have noticed a feature box above your news feed. If you’re as adventurous as I am, upon your inquisitive click, you were soon face to face with an Indian girl who is much smarter than you. In a very simple video, she introduced Facebook Ads to the world.

Even if you’re not a friend of Facebook, you’re well aware of it’s dominance in the “social marketplace.” What you may not have realized however is just how profitable of a company it has become. If you need some proof – look at Facebook’s recent valuation of over $100 Billion. Not too shabby for a company that is less than 10 years old.

Facebook could easily go on not-so-secretly making millions (more like kajillions) through their advertising and the 800 million users would be perfectly happy looking at friends pictures while not being bombarded with unattractive ads. But keeping the status quo would put a wrench in Mark Zuckerberg’s plan to rule the world.

Zuck If You Buck

I’ve always  been a fan of Facebook’s advertising. While most online advertisers assume who is visiting a certain site or viewing a certain page, Facebook knows for sure. With each of the 800 million users creating a personal profile, it removes all guessing as to who the audience is. If I have a clothing company that sells graphic tees that only teenagers in the 90′s would find appealing, I can target that specific group. Facebook allows you to choose exactly who sees your ad. It’s an extremely efficient system in the eyes of the business owner.

Facebook generally has a lower clickthrough rate (CTR) for advertisements than most major Web sites. According to BusinessWeek.com, banner advertisements on Facebook have generally received one-fifth the number of clicks compared to those on the Web as a whole,[69] although specific comparisons can reveal a much larger disparity. For example, while Google users click on the first advertisement for search results an average of 8% of the time (80,000 clicks for every one million searches),[70] Facebook’s users click on advertisements an average of 0.04% of the time (400 clicks for every one million pages).[71]

Sarah Smith, who was Facebook’s Online Sales Operations Manager, reports that successful advertising campaigns on the site can have clickthrough rates as low as 0.05% to 0.04%, and that CTR for ads tend to fall within two weeks.[72] By comparison, the CTR for competing social network MySpace is about 0.1%, about 2.5 times better than Facebook’s rate but still low compared to many other Web sites. According to BizReport.com, Facebook’s low CTR is because Facebook users are more technologically savvy and therefore use ad blocking software to hide advertisements, users are younger and therefore better at ignoring advertising messages, users spend their time communicating with friends and therefore have their attention diverted away from advertisements.[73]

On pages for brands and products, however, some companies have reported CTR as high as 6.49% for Wall posts.[74] Involver, a social marketing platform, announced in July 2008 that it managed to attain a CTR of 0.7% on Facebook (over 10 times the typical CTR for Facebook ad campaigns) for its first client,Serena Software, managing to convert 1.1 million views into 8,000 visitors to their Web site.[75] A study found that, for video advertisements on Facebook, over 40% of users who viewed the videos viewed the entire video, while the industry average was 25% for in-banner video ads.

Thanks to Wiki for this excerpt.

What’s Changing?

Facebook seems to be bringing transparency into their advertising – which I’m all for. If somebody is going to make money off of me, I would at least like the courteousness of knowing how. The social media site is basically saying “Listen, we have big plans for our site. In order to make these things happen and improve your experience, we need to hire top talent. In order to hire top talent, we’ll need to generate more income. In order to increase revenue, we’re going to expose you to some ads.”

The ads will be relevant to you and your interests. If you don’t like an ad, you have the option to delete it. I think the process will constantly improve over time, as users continue to divulge more personal information – and the ads will continue to be more useful.

How do you feel about ads possibly popping up in your news feed?

  • http://myuniversitymoney.com/ My University Money

    I agree with the fact that the transparency is a good thing. You can’t fault the company for monetizing a little bit – especially when they held off for too long. Interesting article!

    • http://twitter.com/prairieecothrif Miss T

      I would agree. Everyone is out there to make money so why should FB be any different. What I like about FB is that I have the option of ignoring and not seeing the ads through my settings. Consumer choice is important.

    • http://twitter.com/prairieecothrif Miss T

      I would agree. Everyone is out there to make money so why should FB be any different. What I like about FB is that I have the option of ignoring and not seeing the ads through my settings. Consumer choice is important.

      • Anonymous

        Very true. FB gives their users complete control – yet still everyone complains about ads, privacy, etc. – even though it’s completely in their hands (if they would take the time to look).

    • Anonymous

      It’s amazing what good can happen when you focus solely on the end product with no regard to money. Zuckerberg waited years and years before answering the “how can we monetize this?” question. This should be a lesson to bloggers. I chuckle at some Yakezie challengers who, in week 1 (after 10 visitors) ask how they can make some dough.

  • Hunter

    I’m ok with ads on Facebook, especially if this prevents users from having to pay a fee. Hopefully FB has learned from Netflix mistakes this year.

    • Anonymous

      I agree, the ads to this point haven’t been too intrusive. The ones that I do come across actually interest me. I’ve been able to discover a few cool things thanks to their ads. I would say they’re more relevant than any google text ad could ever be.

  • Anonymous

    I think it’s moves like this that will eventually lead to, dare I say, the demise of Facebook. I take that back; the Book is here and it is here to stay, but I do believe that running ads on the homepage to be intertwined with you friends updates and posts will do nothing but alienate their users. I understand what they are trying to do, in constantly changing the infrastructure of the site and staying a leader in innovation in the space; its a great philosophy and will lead to years of success (see: Apple). Having said that, the last thing I want when I’m trolling my homepage is to see an update from my friend on the Vandy game followed by a sale update from Nordstroms. I’m all for monetizing as well; this is America. But I do believe that it needs to stick to its roots and the bread n’ butter of what had led to its dominance: the ease of communication. You start making the site less user friendly and more cluttered (still don’t and will not get the “Timeline” feature) and you end up with a site that becomes increasingly less personal and increasingly less private. When a significant portion of your bottom line is derived from user to user communication and you start moving in a direction that begins to alienate those users and therefore their time spent on your site, well I suggest you turn around.

    http://mashable.com/2011/10/18/facebook-users-dislike-changes/

    • Anonymous

      One thing that is always constant with FB is that they’re always evolving. Sometimes good, sometimes fantastic. Dare I say – they haven’t made a bad change to date? I think the only problem is that people (myself included) don’t understand the changes. For instance, the new timeline feature. It makes no sense to me – so naturally I don’t like it; but I fully trust the engineers that designed the feature. So after a bit of resistance, I’m sure the unique benefits will be seen.

      I have no problem with ads being displayed in my newsfeed. I would argue that the ads are less annoying than half the status updates of my “friends.” I would rather read about Jos A Banks’ Buy 1 Get 6 Free Promotion instead of reading about what Rachel had for breakfast.

  • http://www.worldoffinance.biz/ World of Finance

    I knew this was coming… the business model of the past has changed… before you paid for content and now the content is free. Advertisers pay the content/platform creators and the consumers buy the products marketed by the advertisers. Even games on the phone are free but if you notice there are ads on the screen…. you get what you pay for lol.

    • http://www.worldoffinance.biz/ World of Finance

      Also, there is a lot of hype over Facebook’s IPO… company has a lot of public interest.

      • Anonymous

        Company has a lot of private interest…have you seen what their private stake is selling for already???

  • Pingback: Best Financial Articles of the New Year | Personal Investment Management and Financial Planning

  • Pingback: Carnival Of Financial Camaraderie #15 | Boomer & Echo

  • Pingback: OCAAT Weekly Roundup, The Key Word Research Edition | My Blog

  • http://www.101centavos.com/ 101 Centavos

    FB needs to sell eyeballs any way it can. That’s something to get used to with any social media platform.

  • Pingback: The Best of Money Carnival #135 - It's a New Year of Money Edition! | Sustainable Personal Finance

  • Pingback: Carnival of Retirement – First Edition - Passive Income to Retire

  • Pingback: Totally Money Blog Carnival #49 |

  • Pingback: My Blog » Blog Archive » Carnival of Wealth, Post-Epiphany Edition | Control Your Cash …

  • Pingback: Carnival of Wealth, Post-Epiphany Edition | Control Your Cash: Making Money Make Sense

  • Pingback: Carnival of Wealth, Post-Epiphany Edition | My Blog

  • Pingback: February Blog Earnings and Update

  • http://www.makemoneyideeas.webatu.com/ Chrissy

    FB is becoming a tough competitor for Google but in advertising I think it will take much more time to beat Google(I think is less possible to beat the big G). As you mentioned the clickthrough rate is lower and that is kind of inconvenient for online advertisers .

  • Pingback: How Low Can You Go?

Previous post:

Next post: